+1 (713) 489-4735
You did the work. The claims went out. And somewhere between submission and payment, a chunk of your revenue just stopped moving. That’s the reality for most practices we audit. Aged claims sitting in payer queues. Denials nobody’s worked. Timely filing clocks running out while the AR report keeps growing.
At One O Seven RCM, we focus on one job: getting your money out of payer systems and back into your bank account. Our accounts receivable follow-up team works claims by payer rules, not generic checklists. That means knowing each payer’s filing window, appeal logic, and escalation path.
Practices that move their healthcare accounts receivable management to us usually see Days in AR drop within the first 30 to 60 days. No long contracts. No setup delays. Just claims getting worked the way payer rules require.
This isn’t a generic checklist we pulled off a billing forum. The One O Seven AR Recovery Protocol is a six-stage, payer-driven ar follow up process we built around the realities of US healthcare RCM, where every payer has its own filing window, appeal logic, and escalation path. It’s the same protocol we run for solo practices, multi-specialty groups, and high-volume billing operations.
Here’s how each stage works and what you get from it.
Every engagement starts with a full read of your AR aging report, payer history, and timely filing deadlines. Claims get segmented by aging bucket (0 to 30 days, 31 to 60, 61 to 90, 91 to 120, and 120-plus), payer type, and denial category. This is the foundation of structured accounts receivable follow-up; without it, ar follow up services run blind.
Output: A prioritized recovery list ranked by recovery probability and dollar value.
Not every claim deserves the same urgency. We rank each one using internal criteria that weigh claim age, payer filing limits, dollar amount, and denial complexity. High-dollar claims close to timely filing get escalated the same day. This is where ar claims follow-up stops being reactive and starts being strategic.
Output: A structured work queue so no recoverable claim gets buried under low-value accounts.
Each payer gets contacted through its approved channel, whether that's the portal, a 276/277 clearinghouse transaction, or a direct phone call. Every interaction is logged with the date, the rep's name, a reference number, and the next action. That's the part of the ar follow up process most teams skip, and it's also the part that wins appeals later.
Output: A verified claim status with documented payer response and a defined follow-up timeline.
Denied claims get reviewed against the denial code, EOB, and original claim data. Coding errors get corrected, missing documentation gets sourced, and appeals get drafted inside payer-specific appeal windows. The documentation requirements for ar follow-up at this stage are non-negotiable; one missing field can kill the appeal.
Output: A corrected, resubmitted claim with appeal documentation attached and the deadline tracked.
Claims with no payer response after the standard follow-up window move into a separate escalation track. This includes secondary outreach, regulatory escalation where applicable, and payer-specific no-response resolution. No claim sits silent forever inside this protocol.
Output: Every unresponsive claim has a defined next action, an owner, and a resolution deadline.
Recovered payments are posted, reconciled against the original claim amounts, and any underpayments get flagged for contract review. You get a monthly AR report covering recovery rates, denial trends, DAR movement, and net collection rate.
Output: A monthly AR performance report with insights and improvement recommendations you can act on.
Process tells you how we work. Scope tells you what we recover. This section answers the second question. Here’s exactly what our ar follow up services and medical accounts receivable services pull back into your practice’s revenue.
Every payer has its own filing window, escalation path, and approved contact channel. We work each one accordingly. That means payer portal access for daily status checks, 276/277 transaction tracking through your clearinghouse, direct follow-up calls with documented reference numbers, and supervisor escalation when a frontline rep won't move the claim. Our ar follow up services aren't generic outreach. They follow payer-specific protocols built around how Medicare, Medicaid, BCBS, UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, Cigna, and Humana actually process their queues.
Most billing teams stop working a claim once it crosses 90 days. We don't. Aged claims recovery is its own discipline because claims sitting in the 60, 90, and 120-plus day buckets need a different approach than current AR. Our outstanding ar recovery services start by sorting aged claims into recoverable and unrecoverable based on payer history, denial reason, and remaining filing window. Then we follow up unpaid medical claims through aged claims recovery workflows that are designed specifically for what payers do to old AR.
Denials get analyzed against the denial code, EOB, and original claim data before anyone touches a keyboard. Our scope here covers medical necessity denials, timely filing denials, coding errors, authorization failures, and coordination of benefits issues. Appeal letters get drafted with payer-specific language, appeal deadlines get tracked, and second-level appeals get filed where the payer allows them. This is where accounts receivable follow-up turns into actual revenue recovery instead of just status updates.
Patient AR isn't collections work. It's communication. We handle statement generation, payment plan setup, balance clarification calls, and the coordination between what the insurance paid and what the patient actually owes. The goal is the balance gets paid and the patient still trusts your practice. Aggressive collections destroys both.
Most practices don't know they're being underpaid. Payments come in, get posted, and the AR closes out. But payers regularly pay below contracted rates, and those underpayments add up to real money over a year. We compare every payment against your contracted fee schedule, flag the gaps, and file adjustment requests on the underpaid claims. This is one of the highest-ROI services in healthcare AR, and it's the one most practices overlook.
AR follow-up isn’t one workflow run five different ways. The denial patterns, payer rules, documentation standards, and filing timelines change significantly between specialties, and healthcare accounts receivable management only works when those differences get respected. We build specialty-specific follow-up workflows because the same denial code means different things in behavioral health than it does in DME.
Hospital denial management services address a different challenge. DRG downgrades, inpatient versus observation disputes, and high-dollar medical necessity challenges require deeper expertise. Our hospital denial management process includes physician advisor coordination, peer-to-peer review support, and stratification by dollar value so the highest-recovery opportunities get worked first. We prioritize by impact, not by queue order.
One O Seven provides claim denial management services across all 50 states, including the six WISeR model states: New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, and Washington, where new prior authorization workflows are now required.
Every specialty has unique payer denial patterns. Our claim denial management services team maps the most common denial triggers for your specialty by payer before we start.
Most practices ask the same question before committing to medical accounts receivable outsourcing services: why pay an outside company to do something we could hire for internally? Fair question. Here are six honest answers that hold up under a CFO’s scrutiny.
"I'd been trying to get credentialed with Aetna and BCBS for four months before finding One O Seven RCM. My dedicated specialist caught three taxonomy errors in my CAQH profile that nobody had flagged. We were approved with both payers in 11 weeks. The biweekly updates made the whole process feel manageable for the first time." Read More
"I'd tried twice to get paneled with UnitedHealthcare and kept hitting the same wall. One O Seven RCM ran a pre-submission audit and found my behavioral health application had been submitted to the wrong division both times. They resubmitted correctly and I was approved in eight weeks. That's the difference a real pre-submission audit makes." Read More
"We were opening locations in Texas and Florida simultaneously and needed credentialing in both states at the same time. One enrollment manager handled everything, coordinated both state Medicaid applications, and had our billing system ready the day our first contract arrived. We didn't lose a single billing day in either location." Read More