Every denied 97162 claim costs your physical therapy practice more than the $101 reimbursement you lost. Factor in the staff time to investigate, appeal, and resubmit, and a single preventable denial can run $30 to $50 in administrative overhead on top of the lost revenue.
Multiply that across a month of evaluation claims, and the number stops feeling minor.
CPT code 97162 is the AMA-designated billing code for a moderate-complexity physical therapy evaluation. It requires documented assessment of three or more body systems, one to two patient comorbidities or personal factors affecting the plan of care, and moderate-level clinical decision-making for an evolving clinical presentation.
Most practices bill this code more than any other evaluation code. And most practices have at least one recurring denial pattern tied to it that nobody’s had time to dig into.
This guide covers what your billing team and clinical staff need to get 97162 claims paid cleanly in 2026:
- What CPT code 97162 means and the clinical criteria for using it
- How 97162 differs from 97161 and 97163, with a side-by-side comparison
- Documentation requirements that survive payer audits
- Every modifier that applies to 97162 and when to use each one
- NCCI bundling rules and which code combinations trigger edits
- 2026 Medicare reimbursement rates with full RVU breakdown
- How much revenue your practice actually loses from 97162 denials
- The five most common denial reasons and how to prevent each one
- What changed for 2026: conversion factor, KX threshold, telehealth status
- How credentialing gaps silently kill your 97162 reimbursement
What Is CPT Code 97162?
Official 97162 CPT Code Description
CPT code 97162 is defined by the American Medical Association (AMA) as a physical therapy evaluation of moderate complexity. The code was introduced in January 2017 when the tiered evaluation system replaced the legacy single-code structure that had been in place under 97001. Under the current framework, 97162 sits between 97161 (low complexity) and 97163 (high complexity).
In most outpatient PT clinics, 97162 is the evaluation code you’ll bill more than any other. The moderate complexity PT eval code covers the middle ground where patients aren’t straightforward but aren’t critically complex either.
The full 97162 CPT description breaks into three required pillars:
| Evaluation Component | 97162 Moderate Complexity Requirement |
| Patient History | 1 to 2 personal factors and/or comorbidities that directly influence the plan of care |
| Examination | Assessment of 3 or more elements across body structures, functions, activity limitations, or participation restrictions |
| Clinical Presentation | Evolving condition with changing characteristics, requiring moderate clinical decision-making |
Here’s something most resources gloss over, and it’s the single biggest reason 97162 claims get downcoded.
The evaluation code is determined by the lowest qualifying pillar, not the highest. If your patient history and examination both support moderate complexity but the clinical presentation is stable and predictable, the correct code is 97161. It doesn’t matter how thorough the exam was. All three pillars must independently meet moderate-complexity criteria before 97162 can be billed.
That rule catches practices off guard constantly. A therapist documents an extensive evaluation with four exam elements and two comorbidities, but describes the clinical presentation as “stable with predictable recovery trajectory.” The payer’s auditor reads that as low-complexity clinical decision-making. The claim gets downcoded to 97161, and the practice loses the reimbursement difference without even realizing why.
Is CPT Code 97162 Timed or Untimed?
CPT code 97162 is an untimed, service-based code. You bill it once per evaluation session regardless of how long the evaluation takes, provided the documentation supports moderate complexity across all three pillars.
The typical benchmark is approximately 30 minutes of face-to-face patient contact. But billing is based on complexity, not on the clock.
Evaluation codes like 97162 don’t follow the 8-minute rule. That rule applies exclusively to timed therapeutic procedure codes such as 97110 (therapeutic exercise) and 97140 (manual therapy). When a therapist performs both an evaluation and treatment on the same day, evaluation time is excluded from the 8-minute calculation for treatment units. Separate billing categories entirely.
The Medically Unlikely Edit (MUE) for CPT 97162 limits billing to 1 unit per date of service per provider. Because it’s untimed, there is no scenario where billing multiple units of 97162 on the same date is appropriate. If your system allows more than one unit to populate on a charge entry screen, that’s a configuration problem worth fixing before it becomes a compliance issue.
Who Can Bill CPT Code 97162?
Only qualified licensed clinicians can perform and bill physical therapy evaluations. Physical therapist assistants (PTAs) and occupational therapy assistants (OTAs) cannot perform initial evaluations or re-evaluations under Medicare, Medicaid, or the vast majority of commercial payer contracts.
The rendering NPI on the claim must match the licensed physical therapist who personally conducted the evaluation. When a PTA’s NPI appears on a 97162 claim line, the result is an automatic denial. That’s a credentialing and enrollment issue that should be caught at the scheduling level, not after the claim gets rejected.
This is also where credentialing becomes a billing issue. If a newly hired PT hasn’t completed payer enrollment, claims submitted under their NPI will deny regardless of documentation quality. Practices that separate credentialing from billing operations often discover this gap only after weeks of unpaid evaluations have accumulated. By the time someone notices, you’re looking at a backlog of claims that need to be resubmitted once enrollment clears, and some of those may have already crossed timely filing deadlines.
At One O Seven RCM, we handle credentialing at $99 per payer enrollment, the lowest rate in the industry, specifically because we’ve seen how delays in provider enrollment create silent revenue leaks that practices don’t catch until the aging report tells a painful story.
When Should You Use CPT Code 97162?
Clinical Criteria for Selecting CPT 97162
Selecting the right CPT code for a physical therapy evaluation and treatment session comes down to three documented criteria. Use CPT code 97162 only when all three are met simultaneously:
1. History: 1 to 2 Comorbidities or Personal Factors
The patient presents with at least one condition or personal circumstance that complicates the plan of care. Diabetes affecting tissue healing counts. So does obesity limiting exercise tolerance, a prior surgical history that alters the rehab approach, advanced age creating fall risk, or occupational demands like heavy lifting that must be factored into goal-setting.
These factors don’t need to be the primary diagnosis. They just need to demonstrably influence how you design the treatment plan. If they’re listed in the history but never referenced in your clinical reasoning, auditors won’t count them.
2. Examination: 3 or More Elements Assessed
The evaluation must cover at least three distinct assessment areas across body structures, functions, activity limitations, or participation restrictions. Strength testing plus range of motion plus balance assessment plus gait analysis gets you there. Only two elements documented? That’s 97161 territory.
Each element needs objective, measurable findings attached to it. “Balance assessed” doesn’t satisfy the requirement. “Berg Balance Scale score 38/56” does.
3. Clinical Presentation: Evolving with Changing Characteristics
An evolving clinical presentation means the patient’s condition isn’t stable or predictable. Pain levels fluctuate between visits. New functional limitations emerge. Weight-bearing tolerance shifts as recovery progresses. The condition is actively changing, which requires moderate-level clinical reasoning when building the plan of care.
If any single pillar falls below moderate complexity, the evaluation must be downcoded to 97161. If all three pillars point to high complexity, with three or more comorbidities, four or more examination elements, and an unstable or unpredictable presentation, bill 97163 instead.
Clinical Scenarios Where 97162 Applies
Scenario 1: Rotator Cuff Repair Patient with Hypertension
A 62-year-old retired construction worker presents six weeks post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. He has controlled hypertension on medication that requires monitoring during resistance exercises. The PT evaluates shoulder ROM, upper extremity strength, scapular mechanics, and functional overhead reach. Pain and mobility are changing week to week as tissue remodels. Two personal factors (hypertension plus occupational history), four exam elements, evolving recovery. Bill 97162.
Scenario 2: Cervical Radiculopathy with Anxiety Disorder
A 38-year-old teacher with cervical radiculopathy also has generalized anxiety that elevates pain perception and affects compliance with home exercises. Assessment covers cervical ROM, upper extremity neural tension testing, grip strength, and postural endurance. Symptoms fluctuate with work stress and sleep quality. Bill 97162.
Scenario 3: Pediatric Post-Fracture with Developmental Delay
A 14-year-old with a healed tibial fracture and mild developmental delay affecting motor planning. The PT evaluates gait mechanics, lower extremity strength, balance, and functional mobility during age-appropriate tasks. Movement patterns are changing as weight-bearing progresses. Bill 97162.
In all three scenarios, the documentation must connect the comorbidities or personal factors to the treatment approach and explain why the clinical presentation is evolving rather than stable. Without that explicit connection, payers can argue the evaluation was low complexity. And they will.
CPT 97161 vs 97162 vs 97163: Choosing the Right Evaluation Complexity Level
Side-by-Side Comparison Table
| Criteria | CPT 97161 (Low) | CPT 97162 (Moderate) | CPT 97163 (High) |
| Personal Factors / Comorbidities | 0 | 1 to 2 | 3+ |
| Body Systems Examined | 1 to 2 elements | 3+ elements | 4+ elements |
| Clinical Presentation | Stable, predictable | Evolving, changing | Unstable, unpredictable |
| Decision-Making Complexity | Low | Moderate | High |
| Typical Face-to-Face Time | ~20 minutes | ~30 minutes | ~45 minutes |
| 2026 Medicare National Rate | ~$93 | ~$101.20 | ~$114 |
| Code Type | Untimed / Service-Based | Untimed / Service-Based | Untimed / Service-Based |
| MUE (Units Per DOS) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Verify exact 2026 rates for your locality using the CMS PFS Look-Up Tool.
The CPT code 97161 description covers the most straightforward evaluations. Stable patient, no significant comorbidities, one to two assessment elements, predictable clinical presentation. A patient with an isolated ankle sprain and no medical history fits here.
The 97163 CPT code description applies to the most complex cases. Unstable or unpredictable presentation, three or more comorbidities influencing the treatment plan, four or more examination elements. Stroke patients with cardiac history, cognitive deficits, and complex medication regimens often qualify.
The real difference between 97161 and 97162 is not time. It’s the complexity your documentation supports. A 35-minute evaluation on a stable patient with a single straightforward complaint is still 97161. What moves you to 97162 is clinical reasoning documented across all three pillars, not minutes on the clock.
The Most Expensive Coding Mistake in PT Billing
Selecting 97162 because the session lasted 30 minutes is one of the most common coding errors in physical therapy. Auditors compare documentation against complexity criteria, not against a stopwatch. When the evaluation note describes a stable patient with minimal comorbidities and only two examination elements, the code gets downcoded to 97161 regardless of session duration.
The reverse is equally damaging. Therapists who routinely bill 97161 for evaluations that clearly document moderate complexity are leaving $8 to $21 per evaluation on the table. Across a practice seeing 15 evaluations per week, that’s $6,200 to $16,300 in annual underbilling from a single code selection error.
One direction triggers audits. The other bleeds revenue quietly. Both come down to the same root cause: code selection that doesn’t match what’s documented.
Not sure whether your evaluations are coded at the right complexity level? That uncertainty costs money in both directions. Undercoding 97162 as 97161 leaves $8 to $21 per evaluation uncollected. Overcoding invites audits and recoupment. One O Seven RCM’s certified coding specialists review every PT claim to match documented complexity to the correct code, at just 2.99% of collections, with no setup fees and no long-term contracts. See how our PT billing works.
Documentation Requirements for CPT Code 97162
What Payer Auditors Check in a 97162 Evaluation Note
Medicare contractors and commercial payers audit CPT code 97162 claims by checking whether the documentation explicitly supports moderate complexity across all three pillars. Vague notes, template-driven records, and missing objective data are the primary reasons evaluations get downcoded or denied outright.
Your documentation needs to cover all of the following.
1. Patient History Must Document:
At least one to two specifically named comorbidities or personal factors. Not “patient has multiple medical issues.” Name them.
What passes audit: “Patient has Type 2 diabetes (A1C 7.8) and BMI of 31. Both conditions affect exercise tolerance and wound healing, requiring modified intensity parameters in the strengthening protocol.”
What fails audit: “Patient presents with several comorbidities.” No names. No connection to the treatment approach. An auditor reads that and sees a low-complexity history.
Include prior level of function compared to current limitations, plus relevant surgical, injury, or treatment history.
2. Examination Must Document:
Assessment of three or more distinct elements with objective, measurable findings attached to each one.
- ROM documented in degrees: “Right shoulder flexion 95°/180°.” Not “decreased ROM.”
- Manual muscle test grades recorded: “R quad 3+/5.” Not “weakness noted.”
- Standardized test scores included: Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go, 6-Minute Walk Test, Oswestry Disability Index, or equivalent validated tools.
Each element must have actual measured values. Writing “strength tested, ROM tested, balance tested” without numbers is the documentation equivalent of leaving the door open for a downcode.
3. Clinical Decision-Making Must Document:
Clear explanation of why the presentation is evolving rather than stable.
What works: “Pain fluctuating from 4/10 to 8/10 over the past week with new onset of nighttime discomfort and decreased tolerance to previously tolerated activities.”
What doesn’t work: “Patient’s condition is changing.” That’s a conclusion without evidence. Auditors need the specifics that led you to that conclusion.
How comorbidities directly influence the treatment approach. Not just that they exist, but how they change what you do. Specific, measurable goals tied to assessment findings: “Improve TUG from 18 seconds to 12 seconds within six weeks.” Rationale for chosen interventions over alternatives.
4. Medical Necessity Statement Must Include:
Why physical therapy is necessary and appropriate for this specific patient. Direct connection between evaluation findings and functional deficits that PT can address. Why the patient can’t achieve functional improvement without skilled PT intervention.
Skip any of these elements and you’ve given the payer an opening. Once a claim gets kicked back, the AR follow-up process to overturn it burns far more time and resources than getting the documentation right from the start.
The Documentation Format That Survives Audits
Use a SOAP note format (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) or the evaluation-specific format recommended by APTA. The format matters less than the content inside it.
The real test is speed. If an auditor can’t locate the specific comorbidities, the three or more examination elements with objective measurements, and the clinical rationale for “evolving presentation” within 60 seconds of reading your note, the documentation needs work.
⚠️ Audit Red Flag: Cloned evaluation notes, where every patient’s documentation uses identical phrasing with only the name and date changed, are the fastest trigger for a targeted medical review. Medicare contractors use text-matching algorithms that flag template language across patient records. Every 97162 evaluation note must reflect the individual patient’s unique clinical picture with patient-specific data.
One step that takes five minutes and prevents weeks of denial rework: have your lead PT review two to three evaluation notes per week against this checklist. A quick internal audit catches documentation gaps before they become denied claims aging on a report that nobody’s working.
Your documentation creates the foundation. But even perfectly documented claims deny when the revenue cycle management process downstream has gaps, whether that’s a missed modifier, a bundling conflict, or a payer-specific rule your team didn’t know about. That’s why documentation and billing workflow have to work as a connected system, not separate departments.
Which Modifiers Apply to CPT Code 97162?
Applying the wrong 97162 CPT code modifier, or forgetting one entirely, is one of the most preventable reasons physical therapy claims get denied. The modifier tells the payer critical context about the service: who performed it, whether it’s part of a therapy plan, and whether related services on the same date are truly distinct.
Get this wrong and the claim bounces. Get it right and it’s invisible. Nobody celebrates a correctly applied modifier, but everyone notices when one’s missing.
Complete Modifier Reference for 97162
| Modifier | Name | When to Use with 97162 | Required? |
| GP | Physical Therapy Plan of Care | Every Medicare PT claim line. Tells the payer this service falls under an outpatient physical therapy plan of care. | ✅ Medicare required |
| KX | Therapy Threshold Certification | After the patient’s cumulative annual therapy spend crosses the $2,480 KX threshold (2026, combined PT + SLP). Certifies continued medical necessity. | ✅ When threshold exceeded |
| CQ | Service Furnished by PTA | When a Physical Therapist Assistant furnishes a service under PT supervision. Triggers a 15% payment reduction. Does not apply to 97162 itself since PTAs cannot perform evaluations, but important for same-day treatment lines. | ✅ On PTA-furnished treatment lines |
| 59 | Distinct Procedural Service | When billing 97162 alongside a code flagged by an NCCI edit, such as 97140, confirming the services are distinct. | ✅ When NCCI edit applies |
| XE | Separate Encounter | CMS-preferred alternative to 59. Indicates the distinct service occurred during a separate encounter on the same date. | ✅ Preferred over 59 by CMS |
| XS | Separate Structure | Evaluation and treatment target anatomically distinct body structures on the same date. | Situational |
| XP | Separate Practitioner | A different qualified clinician performed the distinct service on the same date. | Situational |
| 25 | Significant, Separately Identifiable E/M | A separately billable E/M service was performed the same day as the PT evaluation and both are clinically distinct. | Situational |
| GY | Statutorily Non-Covered | Service is not a covered benefit. Submitted mainly for ABN tracking or denial documentation. | Rare |
| GN | Speech-Language Pathology | ❌ Do NOT use with 97162. GN designates SLP services, while PT services require GP. Using GN will trigger a denial. | ❌ Not applicable |
One modifier that catches billing teams off guard: GN on a PT claim. It seems like a small letter swap, GP versus GN. But that swap turns a payable claim into an instant rejection. If your clearinghouse or EMR auto-populates therapy modifiers, verify the default is set to GP for your PT providers.
Modifier 59 vs. XE: Which One to Use
CMS has stated that the X-modifier series (XE, XP, XS, XU) should replace Modifier 59 whenever possible because X-modifiers provide greater specificity about why services are distinct. In practice, adoption varies widely.
Some commercial carriers still process Modifier 59 without issue. Others reject 59 and require XE specifically. A few don’t recognize X-modifiers at all and will deny both options until you call and sort it out.
Your billing team should verify each payer’s modifier preference during benefit verification. Adding this one field to your intake checklist takes seconds. Skipping it creates days of rework when the modifier-related denial lands on your AR follow-up report.
The KX Modifier Threshold in 2026
The 2026 KX modifier threshold is $2,480 for combined physical therapy and speech-language pathology services under Medicare. Once a patient’s cumulative Medicare-covered therapy charges exceed that dollar amount in a calendar year, the KX modifier must be appended to every subsequent service line, including evaluations billed under CPT code 97162.
Missing KX above the threshold results in automatic denial. No human reviews it. No appeal opportunity until you resubmit with the modifier attached. That’s not a gray area or a judgment call. It’s a system-level rejection that fires the moment the threshold math doesn’t add up.
The Targeted Medical Review threshold remains at $3,000 for 2026. As your patient’s charges approach that level, treat every claim as audit-ready. Above $3,000, Medicare contractors can and do request full documentation for review.
Here’s what catches practices: they track the threshold manually or rely on memory. By the time someone realizes a patient crossed $2,480, three or four claims have already gone out without KX. Those all come back denied. Cleaning that up takes your billing staff away from current work for hours.
The CQ Modifier: Why It Matters Even Though It Doesn’t Go on Evaluations
Medicare requires the CQ modifier on service lines furnished by Physical Therapist Assistants. PTAs can’t perform evaluations, so CQ never appears on a 97162 line. But practices that bill evaluations and PTA-furnished treatments on the same date need to understand how CQ interacts with the overall claim.
When a PT performs the evaluation and a PTA delivers treatment the same day, the evaluation line gets GP only. The treatment lines get both GP and CQ. That CQ modifier triggers a 15% payment reduction on PTA-furnished services.
Practices that fail to append CQ where required face recoupment when audited. And practices that accidentally put CQ on the evaluation line, where it doesn’t belong, create a different kind of denial. Either direction costs money.
Modifier errors are the easiest denial category to eliminate and the most expensive to ignore. One O Seven RCM tracks KX thresholds in real time, verifies payer-specific modifier preferences before submission, and applies the correct modifier on every PT claim line. At 2.99% of collections with no hidden fees, it costs less than the staff time you’re currently spending on modifier-related rework.See how our billing process handles this.
Can You Bill 97162 with Other CPT Codes? NCCI Bundling Rules Explained
Yes, CPT code 97162 can be billed alongside treatment codes on the same date of service. But certain combinations trigger National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits that automatically deny the bundled code unless the correct modifier is applied.
This is one of the most common sources of preventable denials in PT billing. The claim looks clean when it leaves your office. It comes back denied 30 days later because nobody caught the edit conflict during charge review.
97162 and 97140: Billing Together
An NCCI Procedure-to-Procedure (PTP) edit exists between CPT 97162 and CPT 97140 (manual therapy). Submit both on the same date without a modifier and CMS denies the 97140 line automatically. No review, no questions asked.
The fix: append Modifier 59 or the appropriate X-modifier (XE, XS, XP, or XU) to CPT 97140. Not to 97162. The modifier goes on the treatment code, not the evaluation.
Your documentation must support that the manual therapy was a distinct, separately identifiable service from the evaluation. APTA’s NCCI guidance from January 2020 confirms this modifier requirement.
Don’t just append Modifier 59 and move on. If an auditor asks why 97162 and 97140 were billed together on the same visit, your note needs to demonstrate the evaluation and manual therapy addressed different clinical purposes. Without that documentation trail, you’re looking at recoupment months after you thought the claim was settled.
97162 and 97110: Billing Together
Can 97162 and 97110 be billed together? Generally, yes. CPT 97162 and CPT 97110 (therapeutic exercise) aren’t currently paired in the NCCI PTP edit tables. Billing both on the same date of service doesn’t typically trigger an automatic denial.
One caveat worth building into your workflow: CMS updates NCCI edit tables quarterly. The Q1 2026 update was released December 1, 2025. Code pairings that paid without issue last quarter can show up in the next release. Check the current NCCI edit file at least every 90 days, especially for combinations your practice bills frequently.
97162 and 97530: An Important Clarification
Here’s a rule that trips up a lot of practices. NCCI edits do exist between CPT 97530 (therapeutic activities) and the PT evaluation codes (97161, 97162, 97163). Unlike the 97140 edit, this one cannot be bypassed with Modifier 59 or X-modifiers.
APTA’s January 2020 NCCI guidance states it directly: when 97530 and a physical therapy evaluation code are billed together on the same day for the same patient, the evaluation code takes priority and the 97530 line gets denied. The 59 modifier and X-modifier series don’t override this particular edit.
Many practices assume 97530 works the same way as 97140, where a modifier solves the problem. It doesn’t. If therapeutic activities are clinically necessary on the evaluation date, understand that the 97530 charge won’t be paid. Schedule it for a separate date of service when the clinical situation allows.
Codes That Are Inclusive Within the Evaluation
CMS Medicare guidance, including Noridian LCD articles, states that formal assessment codes like CPT 97750 (physical performance testing) and certain manual muscle testing codes are considered inclusive within the initial evaluation. They aren’t separately reimbursable on the same date as 97162.
Billing these codes separately on evaluation day results in a bundling denial. If formal standardized testing beyond what’s included in the evaluation is clinically necessary, schedule it for a subsequent visit when it’s medically appropriate.
Quick-Reference Bundling Table
| Code Combination | NCCI Edit? | Modifier Bypass? | Action |
| 97162 + 97140 | ✅ Yes | Modifier 59 or X-modifier on 97140 | Bill with modifier; document distinct services |
| 97162 + 97110 | ❌ No (verify quarterly) | Not typically required | Bill normally |
| 97162 + 97530 | ✅ Yes | ❌ Cannot bypass with modifier | Do NOT bill together; schedule 97530 separately |
| 97162 + 97750 | ✅ Inclusive | N/A, not separately billable | Do NOT bill separately on eval date |
| 97162 + 97161/97163 | ✅ Mutually exclusive | N/A | Only ONE eval code per discipline per DOS |
| 97162 + 97164 | ✅ Mutually exclusive | N/A | Only ONE eval or re-eval per discipline per DOS |
NCCI edit tables update quarterly. Verify current pairings through CMS before changing billing patterns.
When bundling rules trip up your billing team, the resulting denials don’t just sit quietly. They age. And aged claims that miss timely filing deadlines become permanent write-offs. That’s a revenue cycle management problem that compounds every month it goes unaddressed.
CPT Code 97162 Reimbursement: Medicare Rates, RVUs & Commercial Payer Data [2026]
Knowing what 97162 CPT code reimbursement looks like in 2026 helps you set realistic revenue expectations and catch underpayments before they stack up.
2026 Medicare National Payment Rate
Under the 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS), the 97162 CPT code Medicare national non-facility payment is approximately $101.20. That number comes from multiplying the code’s total Relative Value Units by the 2026 conversion factor.
Here’s how the math breaks down:
| RVU Component | 2026 Value |
| Work RVU | ~1.20 |
| Practice Expense RVU (Non-Facility) | ~1.58 |
| Malpractice RVU | ~0.25 |
| Total RVUs | ~3.03 |
| Conversion Factor (Non-QP) | $33.4009 |
| Conversion Factor (QP/APM) | $33.5675 |
| National Payment (Non-QP) | ~$101.20 |
| National Payment (QP) | ~$101.71 |
Verify your locality-adjusted rate using the CMS PFS Look-Up Tool. Payments vary by Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI).
The conversion factor rose to $33.40, up from $32.35 in 2025. That’s a 3.26% nominal increase. But CMS simultaneously applied a permanent 2.5% efficiency adjustment to work RVUs for untimed codes, and 97162 falls squarely in that category. Net result: most practices see 97162 reimbursement stay flat or dip roughly 1% compared to last year.
If you’re wondering why your deposit doesn’t reflect the “raise” you heard about at a conference, this is why. The conversion factor went up while the RVU value went down. They largely cancel each other out.
Why Medicare Part B Rates Vary Dramatically by State
Medicare doesn’t pay one national rate. The GPCI adjusts payments based on where you practice. The gap between the lowest-paying and highest-paying states for 97162 is over $125 per evaluation.
| State / Region | Estimated Medicare Part B Rate for 97162 |
| Alabama | ~$124 |
| California | ~$106 |
| Florida | ~$169 |
| New Jersey | ~$220 |
| National Average | ~$101.20 |
A practice in New Jersey collecting $220 per 97162 evaluation generates more than double the revenue per eval compared to the national average. A practice in a lower-GPCI region billing the same code receives barely more than $100.
That’s why payer mix and geographic rate analysis aren’t optional. They’re fundamental to knowing whether your evaluation volume is financially sustainable. Two practices with identical patient loads and identical documentation quality can have completely different financial outcomes based on nothing more than zip code and contracted rates.
Commercial Payer Reimbursement Estimates
| Insurance Payer | Estimated Reimbursement ($) |
| Aetna | $74 to $107 |
| Aetna Medicare Advantage | $42 to $107 |
| Anthem Blue Cross | $94 to $150 |
| BCBS of Florida | $49 to $64 |
| BCBS of Illinois | $80 |
| BCBS of Indiana | $96 |
| BCBS of Ohio | $79 |
| BCBS Medicare Advantage | $101 |
| BCBS PA BlueCard | $95 |
| Blue Shield of California | $58 |
| CareSource OH | $84 |
| Cigna | $101 |
| Coordinated Care of WA | $59 |
| CorVel | $78 |
| Department of Labor (FECA) | $144 |
| Devoted Health | $35 |
| Florida Blue | $49 |
| GEHA | $55 |
| Health Alliance Plan of MI | $54 |
| HN1 Therapy Network | $320 |
| Humana | $71 |
| Medicare National Average | $101.20 |
| Medicare Part B (AL) | $124 |
| Medicare Part B (CA) | $106 |
| Medicare Part B (FL) | $169 |
| Medicare Part B (NJ) | $220 |
| MedRisk | $60 |
| Molina Healthcare of WA | $80 |
| OptumCare | $70 |
| PGBA VACCN Region 4 | $111 |
| Premera Blue Cross | $100 |
| Railroad Medicare | $133 |
| Regence | $102 |
| Tricare West Region | $113 |
| UnitedHealthcare | $78 to $103 |
| US Family Health Plan | $113 |
| Workers’ Compensation | $100 |
| Zurich Insurance N.A. | $95 |
⚠️ Disclaimer: Reimbursement rates are estimates based on publicly available data and industry-reported figures. Actual reimbursement varies by geographic location, contracted rates, network status, and specific plan design. Always verify contracted rates with each payer. Medicare rates should be confirmed through the CMS PFS Look-Up Tool.
The spread in this table tells a clear story. The same CPT code pays $35 from one plan and $320 from another. Your practice’s payer mix determines whether 97162 evaluations are profitable or barely cover overhead.
If you haven’t benchmarked your contracted rates against these figures recently, you may be collecting significantly less than comparable practices in your area. That gap compounds with every evaluation you perform.
Is your practice collecting the full reimbursement shown in this table, or leaving money behind on every evaluation? Undercoded evaluations, missing modifiers, and below-market contracted rates add up fast. One O Seven RCM handles code selection, modifier accuracy, and payer follow-up for PT practices at 2.99% of collections. No setup fees. No long-term contracts. The most competitive rate in the industry. See how it works for your practice.
What Changed for CPT Code 97162 in 2026? Key Medicare & Policy Updates
Several 2026 Medicare policy changes hit CPT code 97162 from multiple angles. The conversion factor went up. Work RVUs went down. Telehealth rules that PT practices relied on have expired. And the CPT code set itself got 418 changes, none of which touched evaluation codes.
Here’s what actually matters for your billing.
The 2026 Conversion Factor: Why the “Raise” Doesn’t Increase Your Revenue
CMS increased the 2026 conversion factor to $33.4009 for most clinicians, up from $32.35 in 2025. Practices participating in qualifying Alternative Payment Models get $33.5675. On paper, that’s a 3.26% bump.
Here’s why your deposits won’t reflect it.
CMS simultaneously applied a permanent 2.5% efficiency adjustment to work RVUs for nearly all untimed codes. The 97162 CPT code is untimed. So the RVU value driving your payment dropped while the multiplier went up. They largely cancel each other out.
| Metric | 2026 Value | Impact on 97162 |
| Conversion Factor (Non-QP) | $33.4009 | +3.26% vs 2025 |
| Conversion Factor (QP/APM) | $33.5675 | +3.78% vs 2025 |
| Work RVU Efficiency Adjustment | -2.5% | Partially offsets CF increase |
| KX Threshold (PT + SLP) | $2,480 | Mandatory KX above this |
| Targeted Medical Review | $3,000 | Increased audit probability |
| PTA General Supervision | Permanent | Operational scheduling gain |
| Net Reimbursement Change | ~Flat to -1% | Revenue neutral at best |
If you budgeted around a 3% reimbursement increase for 2026, you’ll feel the gap. CMS reimbursement for 97162 evaluations won’t grow unless RVUs get recalibrated in a future rulemaking cycle.
Until that happens, the only way to protect evaluation revenue is making sure every claim is coded at the correct complexity level, documented fully, and collected without denial delays. That’s a revenue cycle management discipline, not a one-time fix.
Telehealth Status for PT Evaluations After January 2026
Medicare telehealth flexibilities for physical therapists were extended through January 30, 2026, under H.R. 5371. As of February 2026, those flexibilities have expired unless Congress passed additional legislation after that date.
🚨 Action Required: If your practice bills PT evaluations via telehealth for Medicare patients, confirm current eligibility with your Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) for dates of service after January 30, 2026. Billing 97162 via telehealth without confirmed coverage results in automatic “provider not eligible” denials.
Commercial payers may still cover telehealth PT evaluations, but coverage varies by plan and state. Don’t assume what worked in 2025 still applies. Verify coverage with each payer before scheduling telehealth evaluations.
NCCI Edits and MUE Updates: Q1 2026
CMS released Q1 2026 NCCI Procedure-to-Procedure edits effective January 1, 2026, posted December 1, 2025. Medically Unlikely Edits were updated in the same release.
The CPT 97162 frequency limit, set by the MUE, typically restricts billing to one unit per date of service per provider. Verify the current quarter’s MUE file through your MAC. CMS updates these tables quarterly, and code pairings that paid without issue last quarter can show up as new edit conflicts in the next release.
Building a quarterly NCCI review into your billing workflow takes 30 minutes every 90 days. Skipping it can cost you weeks of denial rework when a previously clean code combination suddenly starts getting rejected.
PTA General Supervision: A Scheduling and Revenue Opportunity
General supervision for Physical Therapist Assistants in private practice under Medicare Part B is now permanent. The supervising PT no longer needs to be physically present while the PTA treats. Phone availability is sufficient.
The practical impact for your practice: PTs can dedicate more of their daily schedule to initial evaluations billed under CPT code 97162, which reimburse at higher rates than most timed treatment codes. PTAs manage the treatment caseload under general supervision.
That’s a scheduling shift that improves revenue per provider hour without adding headcount. Practices that haven’t restructured their daily schedules around this rule are leaving money on the table every week.
2026 CPT Code Set: No Changes to PT Evaluation Codes
The 2026 CPT code set released by the AMA included 418 total changes: 288 new codes, 46 revised, and 84 deleted. None of these changes affect CPT codes 97161, 97162, or 97163.
The PT evaluation code descriptions, complexity criteria, and tiered structure remain unchanged from prior years. If someone tells you “97162 changed for 2026,” it didn’t. The code definition is the same. What changed is the math behind how much you get paid for it.
Updates focused on digital health, remote therapeutic monitoring, AI-related codes, and surgical procedures. CMS’s 2026 Therapy Code List updates primarily address RTM codes with new “sometimes therapy” designations, not evaluations.
Top 5 Denial Reasons for CPT Code 97162, And How to Prevent Each One
Most 97162 billing denials fall into a handful of predictable categories. Once you know the patterns, every single one is preventable with the right pre-submission process.
Denial #1: Documentation Doesn’t Support Moderate Complexity
What happens: Payer reviews the evaluation note and determines documentation only supports low complexity. Claim gets downcoded to 97161 or denied outright.
Why it happens: The note uses vague language like “patient has multiple medical issues” instead of naming specific comorbidities. Exam section lists “ROM tested, strength tested” without objective measurements. Clinical rationale doesn’t explain why the presentation is evolving.
Prevention: Every 97162 note must name one to two specific comorbidities, document three or more exam elements with measurable values (degrees, grades, standardized test scores), and explicitly describe what’s changing in the patient’s condition. If the note doesn’t answer “why is this moderate and not low,” it’s going to get downcoded.
Denial #2: Cloned or Template Notes
What happens: Identical evaluation language shows up across multiple patient records. Medicare’s text-matching algorithms flag the pattern. A targeted medical review follows, and recoupment is the usual outcome.
Why it happens: Practices use templates without customizing each field with patient-specific data. The ROM values, strength grades, and clinical rationale read the same for every patient.
Prevention: Templates are fine as a starting framework. But every measurable value, every comorbidity reference, and every clinical rationale statement must be unique to the patient sitting in front of the therapist. If your notes for a 28-year-old athlete and a 72-year-old with diabetes read identically, that’s one of the most visible forms of 97162 CPT code misuse that auditors flag.
Denial #3: Missing KX Modifier Above $2,480
What happens: Patient’s cumulative annual therapy spend crosses the 2026 KX threshold ($2,480 for combined PT and SLP). Nobody appended KX. Automatic denial, no human review.
Why it happens: The EMR doesn’t track cumulative spend against the threshold. Billing team doesn’t realize the patient crossed the cap until the denial shows up on the aging report.
Prevention: Set an EMR alert that triggers when a patient reaches $250 below the KX threshold. Think of it like a low-fuel warning. By the time you see the denial, you’ve already burned billing hours on rework that a simple alert would have prevented.
Denial #4: Wrong Provider Type on the Claim
What happens: Rendering NPI on the 97162 line belongs to a PTA. PTAs can’t perform evaluations under any payer’s rules. Immediate denial.
Why it happens: Scheduling error assigned the evaluation appointment to a PTA. Or the NPI was entered incorrectly during claim prep.
Prevention: Build this check into your scheduling workflow, not your billing workflow. Evaluation visits go exclusively to licensed PTs. Verify the rendering NPI matches the qualified clinician before the claim leaves your office. Catching this at scheduling prevents it from ever becoming a denied claim.
Denial #5: Bundling Violations on Evaluation Day
What happens: Practice bills 97750 or manual muscle testing codes separately alongside 97162 on the same date. CMS considers those assessments inclusive within the evaluation. Denied as bundled.
Why it happens: Therapist performed formal testing during the evaluation. Billing team entered it as a separate charge without realizing CMS treats it as part of the evaluation service.
Prevention: Formal testing performed during the evaluation is part of the evaluation, not a separate billable charge. If standalone formal testing is clinically necessary beyond the scope of the eval, schedule it for a subsequent visit.
These five categories account for the majority of 97162 denials across PT practices. Every single one is preventable with consistent pre-submission review.
If these denial patterns look familiar, they’re costing your practice more than you think. One O Seven RCM’s pre-submission claim scrubbing catches coding errors, missing modifiers, and documentation gaps before claims reach the payer. For denials already sitting on your aging report, our AR follow-up team handles the appeals and gets them resolved, so your staff can focus on patients instead of rework. See how we handle denial prevention.
How Credentialing Gaps Silently Kill Your 97162 Revenue
Here’s a revenue leak most PT practices don’t discover until it’s already cost them thousands.
A therapist joins your practice, starts seeing patients, and bills evaluations under their NPI. Weeks later, you realize their payer enrollment wasn’t completed for three of your top commercial contracts. Every 97162 claim, and every treatment claim, submitted under that NPI for those payers gets denied as “provider not enrolled.”
This isn’t a coding problem. It isn’t a documentation problem. It’s a credentialing gap. And it’s more common than most practice owners realize.
The Financial Impact Is Bigger Than You’d Expect
A single PT performing eight evaluations per week generates approximately $800 to $1,600 in 97162 revenue alone, before treatment codes. If that PT isn’t credentialed with even two major payers, the practice loses $400 to $800 per week in evaluation revenue, plus all treatment code revenue for those patients.
Over a typical 60 to 90-day credentialing delay, that’s $5,000 to $10,000 or more in claims that either deny outright or miss timely filing deadlines and become permanent write-offs.
The worst part: this revenue doesn’t show up as a denial trend that someone investigates. It shows up as scattered rejections across different payers, and the billing team spends hours trying to figure out why specific patients’ claims keep bouncing. By the time someone connects the dots back to an enrollment gap, weeks of revenue are already gone.
The Fix Is Simple When It’s Built Into Your Workflow
Credentialing should begin before the provider’s first patient, not after. The enrollment process needs to run in parallel with your billing operations, not as a separate administrative task that nobody monitors until denials start piling up.
One O Seven RCM handles provider credentialing and payer enrollment at $99 per payer, the fastest and most affordable rate in the industry. We start the enrollment process before your new provider sees their first patient, so your 97162 claims and every other claim submit clean from day one. No credentialing gaps. No enrollment-related denials. No silent revenue leaks. Start credentialing now.
How Much Revenue Does Your Practice Lose from 97162 Billing Errors?
Most PT practices don’t calculate how much revenue they lose from 97162 billing errors. The denials show up as individual line items on an aging report. Nobody adds them up. Nobody connects the patterns. The losses stay invisible until someone finally does the math.
Here’s the math.
| Error Type | Per-Claim Impact | Weekly Impact (15 evals/week) | Annual Impact |
| Undercoding 97162 as 97161 | -$8 to -$21 per eval | -$120 to -$315 | -$6,240 to -$16,380 |
| Missing GP modifier (Medicare denial) | -$101 per denied eval | Varies by Medicare volume | Thousands in rework + lost revenue |
| Missing KX above $2,480 threshold | -$101+ per denied line | Compounds as more patients cross threshold | Accelerating losses through Q3/Q4 |
| Credentialing gap (unenrolled provider) | -$101+ per eval + all treatment codes | -$800 to -$1,600+ | -$10,000 to -$20,000+ during enrollment gap |
| Cloned notes triggering audit | Recoupment of 6 to 24 months of claims | Practice-threatening | $50,000 to $200,000+ in recoupment |
That last row is the one that keeps compliance officers up at night. A targeted medical review that finds systematic template abuse across hundreds of evaluation claims can result in extrapolated recoupment. That means Medicare doesn’t just claw back the specific claims they reviewed. They calculate an error rate, apply it across your entire claim population for the audit period, and send you a bill for the extrapolated amount. It can threaten practice viability.
Every other row represents money that’s recoverable if you fix the process.
Undercoding is the most common and the easiest to correct. A practice billing 15 evaluations per week that improves its code selection accuracy from 70% to 95% correct recovers $4,000 to $12,000 annually from that single change. No new patients needed. No new payer contracts. Just billing what you’ve already earned at the right complexity level.
The modifier and credentialing errors follow the same pattern. They’re process failures, not knowledge failures. Your team probably knows GP is required. The issue is whether there’s a system in place to catch it when someone forgets at 4:30 on a Friday with 12 claims left to submit.
One O Seven RCM eliminates these revenue leaks for physical therapy practices, from correct code selection to modifier management to payer-specific follow-up and denial resolution. Our complete revenue cycle management service runs at 2.99% of collections, with provider credentialing at $99 per payer. No setup fees. No long-term contracts. The most competitive pricing in the industry, backed by a team that handles your entire billing operation so you can focus on patient care.
Schedule a Free Revenue Review |Get Started with PT Billing at 2.99%
Related Physical Therapy CPT Codes
CPT 97162 doesn’t exist in isolation. It’s part of a broader coding family that covers evaluations, re-evaluations, and the treatment codes your therapists bill alongside them. Knowing how these codes relate to each other helps your billing team avoid mismatches and catch errors before claims go out.
| CPT Code | Description | Complexity / Use Case |
| 97161 | PT Evaluation, Low Complexity | Stable condition, 1 to 2 exam elements, straightforward presentation |
| 97162 | PT Evaluation, Moderate Complexity | Evolving condition, 3+ elements, 1 to 2 comorbidities |
| 97163 | PT Evaluation, High Complexity | Unstable presentation, 4+ elements, 3+ comorbidities |
| 97164 | PT Re-Evaluation | Significant, unexpected change after initial evaluation |
| 97165 | OT Evaluation, Low Complexity | Occupational therapy equivalent of 97161 |
| 97166 | OT Evaluation, Moderate Complexity | Occupational therapy equivalent of 97162 |
| 97167 | OT Evaluation, High Complexity | Occupational therapy equivalent of 97163 |
| 97168 | OT Re-Evaluation | Occupational therapy equivalent of 97164 |
| 97110 | Therapeutic Exercise | Strength, ROM, endurance training (timed code) |
| 97140 | Manual Therapy | Joint mobilization, soft tissue techniques (timed code) |
| 97530 | Therapeutic Activities | Functional task training (timed code) |
| G0283 | Electrical Stimulation (Unattended) | E-stim modality, unattended application |
Each of these codes interacts with 97162 in real billing scenarios. Some are same-day treatment codes that require attention to NCCI bundling rules. Others are alternative evaluation codes where selecting the wrong complexity level costs your practice money. The OT evaluation codes (97165 to 97168) follow the same tiered structure but apply to a different discipline, which matters in practices where PTs and OTs share scheduling systems.
If your practice bills across both PT and OT, make sure your team understands that each discipline gets its own evaluation code per date of service. A PT eval (97162) and an OT eval (97166) for the same patient on the same day are two separate, billable services, as long as documentation and provider credentials support both. Billing only one because “they were seen on the same day” is leaving a full evaluation reimbursement uncollected.
Frequently Asked Questions About CPT Code 97162
What is the 97162 CPT code?
CPT code 97162 is a medical billing code from the American Medical Association (AMA) used to report a moderate-complexity physical therapy evaluation. It requires the therapist to document assessment of three or more body system elements, one to two comorbidities or personal factors that influence the plan of care, and moderate clinical decision-making for a patient with an evolving clinical presentation. The code was introduced in 2017 as part of the tiered evaluation system that replaced the legacy single-code structure.
What is the difference between 97161 and 97162?
CPT 97161 covers low-complexity PT evaluations involving a stable, predictable clinical presentation with one to two examination elements and no significant comorbidities. CPT code 97162 applies when the evaluation reaches moderate complexity: three or more examination elements, one to two comorbidities, and an evolving presentation that requires more clinical reasoning. The code is determined by documented complexity, not by session duration.
How often can 97162 be billed?
CPT 97162 is billed once per evaluation session as a service-based, untimed code. One unit per initial evaluation per discipline per date of service. If a patient returns after discharge from therapy, a new initial evaluation (97161 to 97163) may be appropriate rather than a re-evaluation (97164), depending on clinical circumstances and documented medical necessity.
How many units are allowed for 97162?
One unit per date of service per provider. CPT 97162 is untimed, so the 8-minute rule doesn’t apply. The Medically Unlikely Edit (MUE) caps 97162 at one unit per encounter. Verify the current quarter’s MUE through CMS, as these tables update quarterly.
Can you bill 97162 and 97140 together?
Yes, but an NCCI Procedure-to-Procedure edit exists between CPT 97162 and 97140. Append Modifier 59 or an X-modifier (XE, XS, XP, or XU) to the 97140 line, not to 97162. Without the modifier, CMS automatically denies the manual therapy code. Your documentation must support that the evaluation and manual therapy addressed distinct clinical purposes.
Can you bill 97162 and 97530 together?
Not with a simple modifier bypass. Per APTA’s NCCI guidance from January 2020, NCCI edits between 97530 (therapeutic activities) and the PT evaluation codes (97161 to 97163) can’t be overridden with Modifier 59 or X-modifiers. When both are billed on the same date for the same patient, the evaluation code takes priority and the 97530 line is denied. Schedule therapeutic activities for a separate date of service when clinically appropriate.
What does evolving clinical presentation mean?
An evolving clinical presentation means the patient’s condition has changing characteristics rather than remaining stable. Pain levels fluctuate between visits. New functional limitations emerge. Weight-bearing tolerance shifts. Vital signs change in response to comorbidities or activity. If the patient’s presentation is predictable and unchanged, that points to low complexity (97161). The evolving nature of the condition is one of the three required pillars for billing 97162.
What are the CPT code 97162 billing guidelines?
Billing 97162 requires documentation of all three complexity pillars: one to two comorbidities or personal factors in the patient history, examination of three or more body system elements with objective measurable findings, and moderate clinical decision-making for an evolving presentation. Medicare requires Modifier GP on the claim line. The code is billed once per evaluation, is untimed (the 8-minute rule doesn’t apply), and shouldn’t be billed alongside formal assessment codes like 97750 on the same date. CMS considers those assessments inclusive within the evaluation.
What is a re-evaluation in physical therapy?
A re-evaluation is a comprehensive reassessment performed when a patient experiences a significant, unexpected change in condition. It’s billed under CPT code 97164 and is distinct from a progress note, which documents expected, incremental changes between visits. Re-evaluations require the same level of clinical reasoning as initial evaluations and must be documented as medically necessary. Using 97164 when a standard progress note would suffice is a common coding error that increases audit risk.
What are the three categories of clinical assessment for PT evaluations?
The three assessment categories are: patient history (including personal factors and comorbidities), examination of body systems (tests and measures of body structures, functions, activity limitations, and participation restrictions), and clinical decision-making (evaluating the complexity of the patient’s presentation and determining the plan of care). The documented level across all three categories determines whether the evaluation is coded as 97161, 97162, or 97163. The lowest qualifying category sets the code ceiling.
Does 97162 require a referral or prior authorization?
Medicare doesn’t require a physician referral for outpatient physical therapy evaluations. But many commercial insurance plans require a referral, prior authorization, or both before they’ll cover PT services. Failing to verify these requirements before the evaluation creates authorization-related denials that are entirely preventable with a pre-visit eligibility check.
What ICD-10 codes are commonly billed with 97162?
Common ICD-10 pairings include M54.5 (low back pain), M25.511 (pain in right shoulder), S83.511A (ACL sprain, right knee), M62.81 (generalized muscle weakness), R26.89 (other gait abnormalities), and G81.90 (hemiplegia, unspecified). The ICD-10 code on the claim must support the medical necessity of the PT evaluation. A mismatch between the diagnosis code and the documented clinical findings is a common trigger for claim denials.
How to bill 97162?
To bill CPT 97162 correctly: ensure your evaluation documentation supports moderate complexity across all three pillars (history, examination, and clinical decision-making). Append Modifier GP on every Medicare claim line. Add KX if the patient has exceeded the $2,480 annual therapy threshold. Verify the rendering NPI belongs to a licensed PT, not a PTA. Check NCCI edits for any treatment codes billed on the same date. Submit with the ICD-10 code that matches the documented clinical findings.
Protecting Your PT Practice Revenue with Accurate 97162 Billing
Everything in this guide comes back to six things that determine whether your 97162 claims pay cleanly or create problems downstream.
The lowest pillar sets the code. All three moderate-complexity criteria, history, examination, and clinical decision-making, must be independently supported in the evaluation note. If any one falls to low complexity, the correct code is 97161. No exceptions.
Modifiers aren’t optional. GP goes on every Medicare PT claim. KX kicks in at $2,480. Modifier 59 or an X-modifier is required when billing 97162 alongside 97140. Missing any of these means an automatic denial that nobody at the payer will manually override.
NCCI edits change quarterly. A code combination that paid last quarter can deny this quarter without warning. Check current edit tables every 90 days. Pay particular attention to the 97162 plus 97530 pairing, which can’t be bypassed with modifiers.
2026 reimbursement is essentially flat. The higher conversion factor ($33.40) got offset by the 2.5% RVU efficiency adjustment. At roughly $101.20 per evaluation nationally, there’s zero room for revenue leakage from coding errors.
Credentialing gaps create billing problems. An unenrolled provider can cost your practice $10,000 or more in denied claims during a 60 to 90-day enrollment delay.
Compliance dates are non-negotiable. KX threshold: $2,480. Targeted Medical Review zone: $3,000. Medicare telehealth PT flexibilities expired January 30, 2026.
Getting all of this right on every claim, every day, across every payer is a lot to manage in-house. Especially when your team’s primary job is treating patients, not chasing billing rules.
One O Seven RCM partners with physical therapy and rehabilitation practices to handle the entire revenue cycle, from provider credentialing and code selection to modifier accuracy, payer follow-up, and denial resolution.
Our PT billing service runs at 2.99% of collections. Provider credentialing starts at $99 per payer. No setup fees. No long-term contracts. No hidden costs.
When you’re ready to stop chasing denials and start collecting what your practice has earned: